|
jeff6strings
24 posts
![]() |
We have a 3550XL switch with software version 12.1(22) and the gigabit interface is a VLAN trunk to the core switch. All ports on this switch are in the same VLAN (VLAN 100) including the destination (monitoring) port. I would like to monitor all the traffic from all the ports on this switch or on the VLAN not really sure which. After reading the article below on SPAN I'm confused as to which commands I should use in order to monitor the traffic on all the ports or just the VLAN; the destination port is port f0/35. If it makes a difference I'm not interested in the tagging information. I greatly appreciate any assistance with which commands I should use to accomplish the monitoring. Jeff http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3550/software/release/12.1_19_ea1/configuration/guide/swspan.html#wp1078789 |
|
luismg
130 posts
![]() |
switch(conf-t)#default int fa0/35 |
|
jeff6strings
24 posts
![]() |
luismg, thanks for the help as that was the solution especially with the 'rx' variable as testing with new switches they support the 'both' variable and this one did not. Jeff |
|
luismg
130 posts
![]() |
Either using tx or rx will have the same result because a vlan is a software interface, I tried wireshark and is the same, it considers all traffic same send and receive. Kind regards |
|
jeff6strings
24 posts
![]() |
luismg, thanks for the help. jeff |
|
Pedro_Avila
1 post
![]() |
Don´t forget that there is a diference in RX and TX. "For Receive (RX) SPAN, the goal is to deliver all traffic received to the SPAN destination. As So if you want to monitor the traffic before modification, such as QOS, ACLs, etc, configure for RX. sw3# config term For your example configure for the Vlan 100, because every port that you add or remove will be monitored or not. Don´t forget that various ports being monitored can overload your monitored port. Take care if you think to make RSPAN with a fastethernet trunk. Some commands differ from IOS versions and Switchs. Cheers |
|
jeff6strings
24 posts
![]() |
Pedro, thank you for the detailed information, more helpful than some of the article I read on the subject. Jeff |
Viewing 1 - 7 of 7
- 1



